The menu was online, but photographs were still missing
I pointed out another set of missing menu photos. The correction needed a check against every offering, with the one unresolved image left visible in the result.
On 2 November, after the Week 45 menu had gone online, I pointed out that photographs were still missing. This had come up before, and I asked why it kept happening. I supplied four images and told the agent to take the relevant food-photo regions from Cindy’s Facebook posts if it could not find the other originals.
The follow-up covered Yong Tofu, Malaysian mantou, Angku Kuih, Kuih Lapis and radish cake. Four could use the photographs I supplied. For the pink layered Kuih Lapis, the agent used the food region in Cindy’s current Friday-menu poster. That gave this correction two kinds of source: original food photographs and a much smaller picture already placed inside a poster.
The crops needed checking too. An early Angku version cut into the bottom row, so it was revised to retain all four rows of the food box. The Lapis crop was tightened to exclude part of the poster’s promotional badge. Its clean source region was only 278 by 156 pixels. Keeping those native dimensions avoided baking in an enlarged version, but it did not turn the small source into a high-resolution photograph.
The agent then compared the whole menu before and after the photo correction. There were fourteen source offerings. Thirteen now had a photograph, using twelve different image files because the two cassava-kuih entries shared one. The five new photo links were the changes; prices, serving choices, minimum quantities, pickup arrangements and the other menu details stayed the same.
One gap remained: Peach Gum Dessert. The searches recorded for the local archive, design library and Cindy’s Facebook page had not produced a verified photograph. It stayed text-only for both listed pickup days. The result therefore needed to say thirteen out of fourteen, with the missing item named, rather than imply that every photograph had been recovered.
After the correction went live, the agent checked the released files and opened the real homepage. All five new photographs loaded in that check. This established what the website served at the end of this particular update; it did not show that the pictures brought more orders. The recurring omission had required another correction. What made the result useful to me was being able to see which items were now covered, where the small-source limitation remained and exactly which photo we still needed.
